I think that a right is needless for the couple who does not marry.
A necessary thing is a rule only in the inside that is them.
I can think in nothing doubt here, but there is it whether you say
that in the first place there is any kind of right to the couple who married.
I think a right not to have a thing for marriage.
The couple that marries thinks that it is important that the couple
who cannot marry by some circumstances.
Because a thing marries, you should not have a right and should
not go as a rule to have with onself?
『Should unmarried couples have the same rights as married people？』